Search
Trending
India
World
Business
Technology
Automobile
Science
Sports
Health
Entertainment
Finance
Politics
newspepr.com
DISCOVER THE ART OF PUBLISHING
Trending
India
World
Business
Technology
Automobile
Science
Sports
Health
Entertainment
Finance
Politics
Home
Tags
Defended
Tag: defended
Mobile
It appears that Qualcomm has announced a major win in their ongoing dispute with Arm over chip licensing. According to reports, Qualcomm is claiming a “complete victory” in the matter, suggesting that they have successfully defended their position and will be able to continue using Arm’s intellectual property (IP) in their chip designs. The dispute between Qualcomm and Arm centered on the terms of their licensing agreement, with Qualcomm arguing that Arm’s licensing fees were too high and that they were being unfairly restricted in their ability to modify and customize Arm’s IP. Arm, on the other hand, maintained that Qualcomm was attempting to circumvent their licensing agreements and use their IP without paying the required fees. Qualcomm’s claimed victory could have significant implications for the chip industry, as it may set a precedent for other companies to challenge Arm’s licensing terms and fees. It could also potentially lead to changes in the way that Arm licenses its IP, which could have far-reaching consequences for the industry as a whole. However, it’s worth noting that Arm has not yet commented on the matter, and it’s possible that they may still be considering their options and potential next steps. Additionally, the exact terms of the settlement or agreement between Qualcomm and Arm have not been made public, so it’s difficult to say exactly what this “complete victory” entails or how it will impact the industry moving forward. Do you have any specific questions about this dispute or its potential implications for the chip industry?
NewsPepr
-
October 2, 2025
0
Mobile
In a bizarre incident, a social media influencer from Uttar Pradesh has sparked online trolling after she sought donations to buy an iPhone 17 Pro Max. The reason behind this unusual request was that her father had refused to purchase the phone for her. The influencer, who has a sizable following on social media, took to her platforms to share a post asking her fans to donate money so she could buy the latest iPhone model. She claimed that her father had denied her request for the phone, and she was now relying on her online followers to help her achieve her goal. The post quickly went viral, but not for the reasons the influencer might have hoped. Instead of receiving sympathy and donations, she was met with widespread criticism and trolling. Many online users ridiculed her for her entitled attitude and for expecting others to fund her luxury purchases. Some social media users pointed out that the influencer was essentially begging for money to buy a high-end phone, which many people couldn’t afford even with their own hard-earned money. Others mocked her for not being able to persuade her father to buy her the phone and for instead resorting to seeking online donations. The incident has sparked a debate about the sense of entitlement among some social media influencers and the ethics of seeking online donations for personal gain. While some have defended the influencer’s right to ask for help, others have condemned her actions as shameless and irresponsible. As the news of the incident spread, the hashtag “Don’t give her single paisa” began trending on social media, with many users expressing their disapproval of the influencer’s actions. The incident serves as a reminder that social media can be a double-edged sword, and online requests for help or donations must be made responsibly and with consideration for others.
NewsPepr
-
September 28, 2025
0
It appears that Qualcomm has announced a major win in their ongoing dispute with Arm over chip licensing. According to reports, Qualcomm is claiming a “complete victory” in the matter, suggesting that they have successfully defended their position and will be able to continue using Arm’s intellectual property (IP) in their chip designs. The dispute between Qualcomm and Arm centered on the terms of their licensing agreement, with Qualcomm arguing that Arm’s licensing fees were too high and that they were being unfairly restricted in their ability to modify and customize Arm’s IP. Arm, on the other hand, maintained that Qualcomm was attempting to circumvent their licensing agreements and use their IP without paying the required fees. Qualcomm’s claimed victory could have significant implications for the chip industry, as it may set a precedent for other companies to challenge Arm’s licensing terms and fees. It could also potentially lead to changes in the way that Arm licenses its IP, which could have far-reaching consequences for the industry as a whole. However, it’s worth noting that Arm has not yet commented on the matter, and it’s possible that they may still be considering their options and potential next steps. Additionally, the exact terms of the settlement or agreement between Qualcomm and Arm have not been made public, so it’s difficult to say exactly what this “complete victory” entails or how it will impact the industry moving forward. Do you have any specific questions about this dispute or its potential implications for the chip industry?