Contents
Baltimore Sues DraftKings and FanDuel for Exploiting Vulnerable Gamblers
The city of Baltimore has filed a lawsuit against DraftKings and its parent company Flutter Entertainment, alleging that the sportsbooks employ deceptive marketing tactics to target and exploit vulnerable gamblers, particularly those struggling with gambling disorders.
Lead: In a landmark case that could reshape the landscape of sports betting accountability, Baltimore City has taken bold legal action against DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment, the parent company of FanDuel. The lawsuit, filed in the Baltimore City Circuit Court on April 3, 2025, accuses these renowned sportsbooks of engaging in deceptive marketing tactics designed to exploit the city’s most vulnerable residents, particularly those dealing with gambling disorders. This case shines a light on urgent issues in the burgeoning online gambling industry as it challenges the ethics of promotional strategies utilized by these companies.
Details of the Lawsuit
The heart of the lawsuit alleges that DraftKings and FanDuel have not only targeted vulnerable individuals but have also violated Baltimore’s Consumer Protection Ordinance by using misleading promotions to draw in gamblers. The complaint details various strategies that create an environment conducive to increased gambling, putting susceptible individuals at greater risk.
Key Highlights:
– **Targeted Promotions**: The lawsuit outlines strategies like offering bonus bets, which are monetary credits intended to encourage new sign-ups. These credits often come with a short validity period, which the lawsuit claims leads to an uptick in impulsive betting behaviors.
– **Data Exploitation**: The companies reportedly analyze user data extensively, collecting as many as 186 data points per bettor. This data is used to identify users who are susceptible to gambling more and to keep them engaged through tailored promotions.
– **VIP Programs**: The complaint also points to exclusive VIP programs designed to maintain high levels of betting. These programs pair users with hosts who actively promote gambling and rewards engagement.
Quotes from Key Figures
– “These companies are engaging in shady practices, and the people of our city are literally paying the price,” stated Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, underscoring the city’s commitment to protecting its residents from harmful gambling practices.
– Adam Levitt, the attorney representing the city, emphasized the unique position of public entities in holding companies accountable for misconduct, stating, “Public entities are not subject to those sorts of arbitration clauses. They can bring claims to protect their citizens for this type of wrongdoing.”
Impact on Problem Gamblers
The lawsuit draws attention to the alarming prevalence of gambling disorders among online bettors. According to a study from the University of Maryland’s Center of Excellence on Problem Gambling, a significant 20.8% of online sports bettors exhibit signs of disordered gambling. This figure starkly contrasts with the 11.3% of in-person bettors displaying similar signs, highlighting the urgent need for accountability in the online gambling industry.
The lawsuit suggests that instead of exploiting vulnerable gamblers, companies like DraftKings and FanDuel could leverage their valuable data to provide support. The complaint notes, “DraftKings and FanDuel could leverage their troves of user data for good if they wanted to.”
Regulatory Measures in Other Countries
Interestingly, Flutter Entertainment has instituted certain protections in the UK that are not in place in the U.S. These include:
– Financial vulnerability checks
– Restrictions on VIP program access
– Age-related restrictions for bettors under 25 years old
These protective measures could potentially mitigate the risks faced by gamblers, a point emphasized in the Baltimore lawsuit.
The Bigger Picture
In the broader context, this lawsuit is not an isolated incident. It marks the first instance where a U.S. public entity has officially taken action against online sportsbooks following the 2018 Supreme Court decision that allowed states to legalize sports betting. The significance of this case cannot be underestimated, as it could set a precedent for further legal actions against similar corporations across the country.
Baltimore’s lawsuit might resonate with numerous individual bettors who have faced difficulties but feel disempowered due to obligatory arbitration clauses in their sign-up agreements. According to Levitt, this case could pave the way for a more extensive conversation on gambling accountability and ethics.
Revenue and Sports Betting in Maryland
Maryland has seen a rapid expansion in sports betting since it was legalized in 2021. Fiscal year 2024 statistics indicate that nearly $5.4 billion was wagered, generating over $60 million in tax revenue attributable to sports gambling.
– In January 2025, bettors gambled more than $457 million on DraftKings and FanDuel, starkly overshadowing BetMGM, which only reported $51 million in bets.
– The state has allocated contributions from sports betting revenue to the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future Fund, designed to enhance public education initiatives, contributing $143 million since December 2021.
Despite this lucrative landscape, Baltimore City does not directly benefit from the sports betting operations, complicating its position in the ongoing negotiations and lawsuits.
What’s Next?
As the investigation continues, both DraftKings and FanDuel are expected to respond within a 30-day window. With the public increasingly aware of gambling’s downsides, this lawsuit exemplifies a rising demand for greater corporate responsibility within the sports betting sector.
Waiting for a response from these giant sportsbooks, the city of Baltimore seeks not only statutory penalties but also injunctive relief that would require these companies to reform their platforms to protect susceptible gamblers.
Conclusion: As the conversation around responsible gaming gains momentum, Baltimore’s lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel could serve as a critical turning point for accountability in online gambling. The outcome may not only affect the parties involved but could also alter the landscape of gambling practices across the United States, reinforcing the need for ethical marketing and consumer protection standards.
Keywords: Baltimore lawsuit, DraftKings, FanDuel, vulnerable gamblers, gambling disorders, Consumer Protection Ordinance, Maryland sports betting, online gambling accountability, VIP programs, responsible gaming.
Hashtags: #Baltimore #DraftKings #FanDuel #GamblingAwareness #SportsBetting #ConsumerProtection #ResponsibleGaming
Source link
