Contents
Supreme Court Petition Calls for FIR Against Delhi High Court Justice Yashwant Varma
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court urging for the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court, following allegations of illicit cash being discovered at his official residence. The case is set for urgent hearing amid concerns over judicial accountability.
Lead: In a significant legal development, a petition was submitted to India’s Supreme Court on [insert date] seeking the registration of an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma, a judge of the Delhi High Court. The petition arises from allegations of large sums of unaccounted cash being found at his residence during an emergency incident involving the fire brigade. The matter was brought to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna for urgent consideration, emphasizing issues of judicial integrity and accountability.
Key Details of the Petition
– **Petitioner**: Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, representing the petitioners.
– **Allegation**: Discovery of illicit cash at Justice Varma’s residence during a fire brigade intervention.
– **CJI’s Response**: CJI Khanna noted the case is listed but advised against public commentary during the proceedings.
– **Co-Petitioner’s Statement**: “If this amount had been found in a businessman’s home, enforcement bodies would have pursued action immediately,” pointing to a perceived disparity in how cases are handled based on the individual’s position.
Concerns Over Judicial Privilege
– The petitioners argue that the current judicial directives create a “special class of privileged individuals” shielded from legal proceedings.
– They criticize the Supreme Court’s prior ruling in *K. Veeraswami v. Union of India*, claiming it hinders accountability for judges involved in criminal activities.
– The plea states:
> “Judges do not commit crimes, but incidents such as Justice Varma’s cannot be overlooked within the established legal framework.”
Call for Action
The petition calls for:
– The immediate registration of an FIR regarding the recovered illicit cash.
– A declaration that previous directives preventing FIR registration against judges without CJI consultation are flawed.
– An investigation free from judicial interference to uphold the integrity of India’s legal system.
Conclusion: The petition against Justice Yashwant Varma not only highlights potential corruption within the judiciary but also raises significant concerns about judicial accountability in India. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this critical case, the implications for judicial conduct and public trust in the legal system could be profound.
Keywords: Supreme Court, FIR, Justice Yashwant Varma, judicial accountability, petition, illicit cash, Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, K. Veeraswami v. Union of India, Delhi High Court.
Hashtags: #SupremeCourt #JudicialAccountability #JusticeYashwantVarma #FIR #CorruptionInJudiciary
Source link
