Exclude - newspepr.com

Home Tags Exclude

DuckDuckGo has introduced a new feature that allows users to hide AI-generated images in their search results. This move is likely in response to the growing concern about the prevalence of AI-generated content online and the potential for it to be misleading or deceptive.

With this feature, users can opt to exclude AI-generated images from their search results, providing a more accurate and trustworthy search experience. This is particularly important for users who rely on search engines for research, fact-finding, or other purposes where accuracy is crucial.

It's worth noting that the ability to hide AI-generated images is not the same as removing them entirely from the internet. Rather, it gives users more control over the type of content they see in their search results, allowing them to make more informed decisions about the information they encounter online.

This feature is also a testament to DuckDuckGo's commitment to user privacy and transparency. By providing users with more control over their search results, DuckDuckGo is demonstrating its dedication to empowering users and promoting a more open and honest online environment.

It will be interesting to see how this feature is received by users and how it impacts the overall search experience. As AI-generated content continues to evolve and become more sophisticated, it's likely that we'll see more developments in this area, with search engines and other online platforms working to strike a balance between providing accurate information and protecting users from potential misinformation.

Technology

DuckDuckGo has introduced a new feature that allows users to hide AI-generated images in their search results. This move is likely in response to the growing concern about the prevalence of AI-generated content online and the potential for it to be misleading or deceptive. With this feature, users can opt to exclude AI-generated images from their search results, providing a more accurate and trustworthy search experience. This is particularly important for users who rely on search engines for research, fact-finding, or other purposes where accuracy is crucial. It’s worth noting that the ability to hide AI-generated images is not the same as removing them entirely from the internet. Rather, it gives users more control over the type of content they see in their search results, allowing them to make more informed decisions about the information they encounter online. This feature is also a testament to DuckDuckGo’s commitment to user privacy and transparency. By providing users with more control over their search results, DuckDuckGo is demonstrating its dedication to empowering users and promoting a more open and honest online environment. It will be interesting to see how this feature is received by users and how it impacts the overall search experience. As AI-generated content continues to evolve and become more sophisticated, it’s likely that we’ll see more developments in this area, with search engines and other online platforms working to strike a balance between providing accurate information and protecting users from potential misinformation.

NewsPepr -

July 18, 2025

In 2016, then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris issued a statement that daily fantasy sports (DFS) contests were likely illegal under California law. However, she also expressed a willingness to work with the industry and state lawmakers to create a regulatory framework that would allow DFS to operate legally in the state.

Harris's statement came after several other states, including Nevada, Texas, and Illinois, had taken steps to restrict or ban DFS operations. At the time, DFS operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel had been operating in California without explicit permission or regulation from the state.

In response to Harris's statement, the California legislature introduced several bills that aimed to regulate DFS in the state. One of those bills, Assembly Bill 1437, was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown in 2016. The law required DFS operators to register with the state and pay a licensing fee, and it also imposed certain consumer protection measures, such as age verification and responsible gaming protocols.

Under the law, DFS operators are allowed to offer contests to California residents, but they must comply with certain rules and regulations, including:

1. Registering with the state and paying a licensing fee
2. Implementing age verification and responsible gaming protocols
3. Providing clear and transparent rules and scoring systems
4. Offering tools to help customers set limits on their play and exclude themselves from playing
5. Paying taxes on their revenue

Despite the regulatory framework, some critics have argued that DFS remains a form of illegal gaming under California law. In 2020, a California appeals court ruled that a lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel could proceed, on the grounds that the companies' DFS contests constituted illegal gambling under state law.

It's worth noting that the legal landscape surrounding DFS is constantly evolving, and the industry remains subject to ongoing scrutiny and debate. While California has established a regulatory framework for DFS, other states have taken different approaches, and the issue remains a topic of contention in many parts of the country.

Sports

In 2016, then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris issued a statement that daily fantasy sports (DFS) contests were likely illegal under California law. However, she also expressed a willingness to work with the industry and state lawmakers to create a regulatory framework that would allow DFS to operate legally in the state. Harris’s statement came after several other states, including Nevada, Texas, and Illinois, had taken steps to restrict or ban DFS operations. At the time, DFS operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel had been operating in California without explicit permission or regulation from the state. In response to Harris’s statement, the California legislature introduced several bills that aimed to regulate DFS in the state. One of those bills, Assembly Bill 1437, was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown in 2016. The law required DFS operators to register with the state and pay a licensing fee, and it also imposed certain consumer protection measures, such as age verification and responsible gaming protocols. Under the law, DFS operators are allowed to offer contests to California residents, but they must comply with certain rules and regulations, including: 1. Registering with the state and paying a licensing fee 2. Implementing age verification and responsible gaming protocols 3. Providing clear and transparent rules and scoring systems 4. Offering tools to help customers set limits on their play and exclude themselves from playing 5. Paying taxes on their revenue Despite the regulatory framework, some critics have argued that DFS remains a form of illegal gaming under California law. In 2020, a California appeals court ruled that a lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel could proceed, on the grounds that the companies’ DFS contests constituted illegal gambling under state law. It’s worth noting that the legal landscape surrounding DFS is constantly evolving, and the industry remains subject to ongoing scrutiny and debate. While California has established a regulatory framework for DFS, other states have taken different approaches, and the issue remains a topic of contention in many parts of the country.

NewsPepr -

July 4, 2025